Machine Learning Based Method for Acoustic Recognition of Anthropogenic Underground Voids

Authors

  • Volodymyr Hnatushenko
  • Yuliia Olevska
  • Viktor Olevskyi
  • Oleksandr Olevskyi
  • Natalya Sokolova
  • Dmytro Gristchak

Keywords:

underground voids, acoustic waves, inverse problems, neural networks, machine learning

Abstract

Underground tunnel identification remains difficult in spite of the development of recognition methods. There is often no direct access to the Earth's surface above bunkers; above-ground structures may be located there; the soil structure may contain dense layers opaque to radio waves. Therefore, it is promising to use geophysics acoustic recognition methods. The study aims to develop an information system schematic diagram for identifying man-made underground cavities using machine learning methods based on acoustic reconnaissance data. In contrast to known methods for monitoring vibration waves during earthquakes, the initiation of vibration waves can be carried out by delivering precise strikes of known power to specified surface points. However, solving the inverse problem for the propagation of acoustic waves is problematic due to the small relative sizes of these structures. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that we find a solution to this problem using machine learning methods based on model calculations for a known geological structure of the soil. Combining it with satellite observation data on the above-ground structures makes it possible to build a neural network for analyzing the vibrations of sensors located in controlled territory.

References

A. Arranz, “Inside the tunnels of Gaza,” Reuters, 2023-12-31, [Online]. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/graphics/ISRAEL-PALESTINIANS/GAZA-TUNNELS/gkvldmzorvb/.

J. Spencer, “These are the challenges awaiting Israeli ground forces in Gaza,” Modern War Institute, 10.11.23, [Online]. Available at: https://mwi.westpoint.edu/these-are-the-challenges-awaiting-israeli-ground-forces-in-gaza/.

T.K. Sarkar, M. Salazar-Palma, M.D. Zhu and H. Chen, “Matrix Pencil Method (MPM),” Modern Characterization of Electromagnetic Systems and its Associated Metrology, 2021, pp. 21-106, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119076230.ch2.

H. Wang, S Ouyang, Q.H. Liu, L. Kefei, Z. Lijun, “Buried target detection method for ground penetrating radar based on deep learning,” Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, vol. 16, issue 1, id. 018503, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.16.018503.

D. Dunkerley, “Acoustic methods in geophysics,” Preview, vol. 2022, issue 218, pp. 42–47, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/14432471.2022.2087935.

C.-H. Lin, J.-C. Liu and C.-W. Liao, “Application of machine learning in underground construction and tunneling,” Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on New Technologies (NewTech'24), Barcelona, Spain, August 25-27, 2024, paper no. 001. https://doi.org/10.11159/icceia24.001.

L. Liu, Z. Song, X. Li, “Artificial intelligence in tunnel construction: A comprehensive review of hotspots and frontier topics,” Geohazard Mechanics, vol. 2, issue 1, pp. 1‒12, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ghm.2023.11.004.

M.D. Hrylitskyi, Ya.I. Kunets and V.V. Matus, “Remote determination of mechanical parameters of thin flat inclusions of low contrast,” Materials Science, vol. 47, issue 5, pp. 703–709, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-012-9447-4.

G. Li, M.T. Hasholt, V.A. Dahl and O.M. Jensen, “Automated analysis of the void structure in hardened concrete based on shape from focus,” Materials and Structures, vol. 57, issue 7, art. 172, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-024-02448-1.

Z. Song, Z. Yang, R. Huo and Y. Zhang, “Inversion analysis method for tunnel and underground space engineering: a short review,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, issue 9, art. 5454, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095454.

J. Krzywanski, M. Sosnowski, K. Grabowska, A. Zylka, L. Lasek and A. Kijo-Kleczkowska, “Advanced computational methods for modeling, prediction and optimization – A Review,” Materials, vol. 17, issue 14, art. 3521, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17143521.

A.A. Howard, S.H. Murphy, S.E. Ahmed and P. Stinis, “Stacked networks improve physics-informed training: Applications to neural networks and deep operator networks,” Foundations of Data Science, vol. 7, issue 1, pp. 134-162, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3934/fods.2024029.

V.Yu. Kashtan, V.V. Hnatushenko, I.S. Laktionov and H.H. Diachenko, “Intelligent sentinel satellite image processing technology for land cover mapping,” Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, no. 5, pp. 143-150, 2024. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2024-5/143.

Yu. B. Olevska, V.I. Olevskyi, O.V., Olevskyi, “Using of fuzzy mathematical models in automated systems for recognition of high molecular substances,” AIP Conference Proceedings, 2018, art. no. 060003. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5064911.

V.I. Olevskyi, V.T. Smetanin and Yu.B. Olevska, “Fuzzy method of recognition of high molecular substances in evidence-based biology,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1895, issue 1, art. 070003, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5007392.

R. Szeliski, Computer Vision: Algorithms and Applications, 2nd ed., Springer Cham, 2022, 925 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34372-9.

Y. Liu, D. Habibi, D. Chai, X. Wang, H. Chen, Y. Gao and S.L. Li, “A comprehensive review of acoustic methods for locating underground pipelines settings,” Applied Science, vol. 10, issue 3, art. 1031, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10031031.

Image Recognition Machine Learning: Use Cases and Common Algorithms, 2025, [Online]. Available at: https://cloudinary.com/guides/front-end-development/image-recognition-machine-learning-use-cases-and-common-algorithms.

P. Baheti, Pattern recognition in machine learning refers to the process of identifying patterns in data. Explore different pattern recognition techniques and use cases, 2022, [Online]. Available at: https://www.v7labs.com/blog/pattern-recognition-guide.

Q. Li, Y. Su, Y. Wu, A. Borgart, and J.G. Rots, “Form-finding of shell structures generated from physical models,” International Journal of Space Structures. vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 11–33, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266351117696577.

W. Huan et al., “Haar wavelet-based classification method for visual information processing systems,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, issue 9, art. 5515, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095515.

V. Olevskyi and Y. Olevska “Geometric aspects of multiple Fourier series convergence on the system of correctly counted sets,” Geometry, Integrability and Quantization, vol. 19, pp. 159–167, 2018. https://doi.org/10.7546/giq-19-2019-159-167.

S. Kuratsubo, E. Nakai, “Multiple Fourier series and lattice point problems,” Journal of Functional Analysis, vol. 282, issue 1, art. 109272, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2021.109272.

V.A. Krysko and D.Y. Gao, Introduction to Asymptotic Methods (Modern Mechanics and Mathematics), 1st ed., Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2019, 270 p.

I. Andrianov, V.I. Olevskyi and Y.B. Olevska, “Asymptotic estimation of free vibrations of nonlinear plates with complicated boundary conditions,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1895, art. 080001, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5007395.

O. Omar, N. Tounsi, E.-G. Ng and M.A. Elbestawi, “An optimized rational fraction polynomial approach for modal parameters estimation from FRF measurements,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 24, pp. 831–842, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-010-0123-z.

H. Van Der Post, A. Schwartz, Finite Element Analysis (FEA) with Python: Unleash Python's Power for Precision Engineering, Reactive Publishing, et al., 2024, 417 p.

D. Nizalov, K. Chmelova, S. Kubakh, O. Nivievskyi, O. Prokopenko, Land Monitoring System in Ukraine. 2014-2015, 2016, [Online]. Available at: https://ukraine-landpolicy.com/files/Yearbook-2014-2015.pdf.

B. Busygin, S. Nikulin, K. Sergieieva, “Solving the tasks of subsurface resources management in GIS RAPID environment,” Mining of Mineral Deposits, vol. 13, pp. 49-57, 2019. https://doi.org/10.33271/mining13.03.049.

D.J. Rumala, van P. Ooijen, R.F. Rachmadi, A.D. Sensusiati and I.K.E. Purnama, “Deep-stacked convolutional neural networks for brain abnormality classification based on MRI images,” Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 36, pp. 1460-1479, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s10278-023-00828-7.

C.A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 4th ed., Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2016, 1104 p.

I.S. Laktionov, O.V. Vovna, M.M. Kabanets, M.A. Derzhevetska and A.A. Zori, “Mathematical model of measuring monitoring and temperature control of growing vegetables in greenhouses,” International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, vol. 15, pp. 325–336, 2020. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijdne.150306.

B.L.S. da Silva, F.K. Inaba, E.O.T. Salles, P.M. Ciarelli, “Fast deep stacked networks based on extreme learning machine applied to regression problems,” Neural Networks, vol. 131, pp. 14-28, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.018.

A. Gallet, S. Rigby, T. N. Tallman, X. Kong, I. Hajirasouliha, A. Liew, D. Liu, L. Chen, A. Hauptmann and D. Smyl, “Structural engineering from an inverse problems perspective,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 478, issue 2257, art. 20210526, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2021.0526.

H. Zhang, A General Approach for Solving Inverse Problems in Geophysical Systems by Applying Finite Element Method and Metamodel Techniques, Technische Universität München, 2016, 121 p. https://books.google.nl/books?id=UgaK0AEACAAJ.

M. Richter, Inverse Problems: Basics, Theory and Applications in Geophysics (Lecture Notes in Geosystems Mathematics and Computing), 2nd ed. Birkhäuser, 2020, 288 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59317-9.

Y. Wang, A.G. Yagola and L.J. Gelius “Editorial: Advances in geophysical inverse problems,” Frontiers in Earth Science, vol. 11-2023, art. 1258335, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1258335 .

G. Plonka and M. Tasche, “Prony methods for recovery of structured functions,” GAMM-Mitteilungen, vol. 37, issue 2, pp. 239-258, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/gamm.201410011.

S. Raschka, V. Mirjalili, Python Machine Learning: Machine Learning and Deep Learning with Python, scikit-learn, and TensorFlow 2, 3rd Edition, Packt Publishing, 2019, 772 p.

A. Géron, Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn and TensorFlow: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques to Build Intelligent Systems, Japan, O'Reilly Media, 2017, 574 p.

I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio and A. Courville, Deep Learning, MIT Press, 2016, 785 p.

D. Bouayad, F. Emeriault, “Modeling the relationship between ground surface settlements induced by shield tunneling and the operational and geological parameters based on the hybrid PCA/ANFIS method,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 68, pp. 142-152, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.03.01148.

V. Mykhin, V. Zagorodnii, V. Liskin, et al, “A model for classifying information objects using neural networks and fuzzy logic,” Scientific Reports, vol. 15, issue 1, 15904, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00897-4.

M. Kobasyar, B. Rusyn, “The Radon transform from application for accurate and efficient curve,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Modern Problem of Radio Engineering, Telecommunication and Computer Science, TCSET-2004, 2004, pp. 223-224.

J. Xia, R. Peng, Z. Li, J. Li, Y. He, G. Li, “Identification of underground artificial cavities based on the Bayesian convolutional neural network,” Sensors, vol. 23, issue 19, 8169, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23198169.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

How to Cite

Hnatushenko, V., Olevska, Y., Olevskyi, V., Olevskyi, O., Sokolova, N., & Gristchak, D. (2026). Machine Learning Based Method for Acoustic Recognition of Anthropogenic Underground Voids. International Journal of Computing, 24(4), 678-686. Retrieved from https://www.computingonline.net/computing/article/view/4332

Issue

Section

Articles